Factors Explaining the Rating of Microfinance Institutions

Print
 
Sep 2007
Saragossa, Spain, September, 05 2007 - The growing relevance of Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) has led to the development of specialized MFI rating agencies that perform global risk assessments.

In this article, the authors have conjectured different hypotheses pertaining to the relationshipbetween financial and social indicators and the ratings assigned. The authors tested the hypotheses empirically by using MFIs' accounting information and ratings from a leading agency. As expected, the larger, more profitable, more productive, and less risky MFIs achieved better ratings. This proves the usefulness of MFIs' ratings for providers of funds. In contrast, the authors did not observe any relationship between social performance and rating. Given MFIs' important social mission, agencies should develop ratings that accurately reflect the achievement of social goals.



 

Research Analysis Tools

The fund indexes, institution benchmarks and other market information displayed here are all Symbiotics designed analysis tools, created in-house by our analysts and experts. Symbiotics has one of the oldest track records in microfinance investment analysis dating back to the late 1990s; its indexes and benchmarks have been regularly used as markers by investors, asset managers, financial institutions and practitioners. These, as well as several other research products, are available through the Research Account. Click on the link below to find out more.

Learn More